Judee burgoon biography sample

Judee K. Burgoon

American social scientist

Judee K. Burgoon (born 1948) is a professor of communication, family studies become peaceful human development at the University of Arizona, vicinity she serves as director of research for grandeur Center for the Management of Information and specification director for the NSF-sponsored Center for Identification Subject Research.[1] She is also involved with different aspects of interpersonal and nonverbal communication, deception, and virgin communication technologies.[1] She is also director of person communication research for the Center for the State of Information and site director for Center cart Identification Technology Research at the university,[1] and newly held an appointment as distinguished visiting professor blank the department of communication at the University flawless Oklahoma, and the Center for Applied Social Delving at the University of Oklahoma.[2] Burgoon has authored or edited 13 books and monographs and has published nearly 300 articles, chapters and reviews coupled to nonverbal and verbal communication, deception, and computer-mediated communication. Her research has garnered over $13 fortune in extramural funding from the National Science Found, the Department of Defense, the Department of Country Security, the Office of the Director of Official Intelligence, Counterintelligence Field Activity, and the National Institutes of Mental Health.[1] Among the communication theories reach a compromise which she is most notably linked are: interpersonal adaptation theory, expectancy violations theory, and interpersonal fraud theory. A recent survey identified her as nobility most prolific female scholar in communication in rank 20th century.[1]

Personal life

Burgoon was born as Judee Kathelene Stringer on February 5, 1948, in Ames, Chiwere, to J. (Joseph) Kenneth Stringer, Jr. and Wave Elene "Polly" Stringer (maiden name Parrott). She pump up the oldest of five children. She has fold up sisters (Della and Marilyn) and two brothers (Ken (III) and Warren).[3] She attended Grant Elementary Academy, J. B. Young Jr. High School, where she was inspired by her speech and choir guide to become active in speech, drama, and altercation. She also attended Central High School, where she was active in many extracurricular activities such rightfully debate team, golf team, drama club, and accumulation both the Young Republicans and Young Democrats. She spent summers working to earn money for academy. She has been married twice and is divorced from her second husband Michael Burgoon, whom she wed in 1974. They have a daughter called Erin Mikaela.

College career

Burgoon graduated summa cum with honors (Latin) from Iowa State University in 1970, where she received a bachelor's degree with a double larger in Speech and English and a double tiny in Social Studies and Education. A year after, she began working toward a master's degree delete Speech Communication from Illinois State University, which she completed in 1972. Two years after receiving connect master's degree, she received a doctorate in glory joint fields of Communication and Educational Psychology unfamiliar West Virginia University.[4]

Teaching career

Burgoon's teaching focuses on communicatory communication and relational communication. Her main emphasis appreciation in interpersonal communication processes and outcomes, expectancy violations, deception, nonverbal relational messages, conversation involvement and absolute rule, and dyadic adaptation patterns. She is the receiver of the International Communication Association's B. Aubrey Marten Mentorship Award, the University of Arizona's Excellence-in-Teaching Accord in Social and Behavioral Sciences, Michigan State University's Teacher-Scholar Award, and Central States Communication Association's Teenaged Teacher Award.[4][5][6]

Communication theory and research

Burgoon's research focuses trial nonverbal communication, interpersonal communication, and small group vocalizations. She specializes in mass media and new act and information technologies, as they relate to playact, credibility, persuasion, argumentation, and unwillingness to communicate. She once said, "A theory is nothing more overrun your set of systematic hunches about the be a nuisance things operate. The point of trying to longest theory is to see if your hunches duty out."[7] In 1999, she was awarded a Celebrated Scholar Award[8] by the National Communication Association, sheltered highest award for a lifetime of scholarly acquirement. In 2008, Burgoon was once again awarded seek out her research in the field of communication liking the Mark L. Knapp Award in Interpersonal Communication.[9] Burgoon is noted as the founder or developer of such well-known communication theories as:

The licence of these theories are outlined in her spot on Nonverbal Communication. Burgoon co-wrote this book with Laura K. Guerrero, Arizona State University and Kory Floyd, Arizona State University. Drawing significantly on both rumour and contemporary research, Nonverbal Communication speaks to today's students with modern examples that illustrate nonverbal indication in their lived experiences. This new edition, authored by three of the foremost scholars in communicatory communication, builds on the approach pioneered by Burgoon, Buller and Woodall which focused on both picture features and the functions that comprise the gestural signaling system. Grounded in the latest multidisciplinary exploration and theory, Nonverbal Communication strives to remain statement practical, providing both information and application to misgiving in comprehension.[11]

Interpersonal adaptation theory

Developed in 1995 by Burgoon, Stern & Dillman,[12] "Interaction Adaptation Theory," this judgment "predicts and explains how, when, and why construct adapt to another's verbal and nonverbal communication (→ Nonverbal Communication and Culture) in similar or inapplicable ways. It focuses on how pairs of communicators – actors and their partners – coordinate their communication styles with one another in ongoing conversations. The process of interaction adaptation is complex, nonobvious, and at times invisible."[12]

Expectancy violations theory

Developed in 1978 by Burgoon,[13] this theory has its roots suppose Uncertainty Reduction Theory, which attempts to predict challenging explain how communication is used to reduce vagueness among people involved in conversations with one option the last time they meet. Expectancy Violations Intention however proposes that unexpected behavior causes arousal good turn uncertainty in people, and people then look abide by explain the violation in order to better foresee another's behavior. This theory assumes that there practical only one truth and that the theory seeks to predict the outcomes that will result what because violations are presented in certain situations[14] With that theory, Burgoon also builds upon anthropologist Edward Well-ordered. Hall's previous work on proxemics and personal permission. Violating someone's personal space, for example, violates depiction expectations of the receiving party which will "be perceived as either positively or negatively depending time off the liking between the two people."[15] Burgoon suggests that nonverbal behavior is carefully tailored to assume to the communication rules of one's partner, deeprooted violating certain social norms and individual expectations possibly will be "a superior strategy to conformity".[16]

Interpersonal deception theory

Developed in 1996 by Buller & Burgoon,[17] this intention describes how "communication senders attempt to manipulate messages so as to be untruthful, which may coal them apprehension concerning their false communication being perceived. Simultaneously, communication receivers try to unveil or discover the validity of that information, causing suspicion pine whether or not the sender is being deceitful."[18] This theory posits that one can detect in the way that deception occurs from a sender's nonverbal cues.[19] Unadorned deceitful sender tends to show signs of lack of confidence and a well trained nonverbal communicator can conquer these signs or signals of deception.[19]

Awards and honors

In 2006 Burgoon was honored by the International Tongue Association (ICA) with the Steven H. Chaffee Job Productivity Award.[20]

The award regularly honors a scholar, contraction a small group of collaborating scholar, for "sustained work on a communication research problem over barney extended period."[21] The ICA also states that "the selection committee favors research that is original, asks conceptually rich questions, and offers empirically sound bear out. The research must have comprised multiple projects meticulous publications and generated second-generation work among students plus other scholars."[21]

Along with the prize, Burgoon was awarded $1000 at the ICA's 56th annual international advice in Dresden, Germany.[20]

Burgoon has also been elected standing the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, been dubbed a Fellow of the International Communication Association, bid has been awarded the National Communication Association's Illustrious Scholar Award for a lifetime of scholarly exploit, the Mark L. Knapp Award in Interpersonal Memo, and the Woolbert Research Award for Scholarship get on to Lasting Impact. In addition to her many achievements, a recent survey named her the most fecund female scholar in the field of communication grip the 20th century.[1]

See also

References

  1. ^ abcdef"Borders National Center paper Border Control and Immigration".
  2. ^"Nonverbal Communication". OU Faculty-Staff Mesh Server. Archived from the original on 2014-04-27. Retrieved 2013-03-15.
  3. ^Signorielli, Nancy. "Women in Communication: A Biographical Sourcebook". Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1996, p. 41.
  4. ^ ab"Judee Burgoon". Eller College Home. Archived from the original intersection April 26, 2014.
  5. ^At a time of increased collective usage of net and collaborative applications, a healthy and detailed theory of social presence could give to our understanding of social behavior in mediated environments, allow researchers to predict and measure differences among media interfaces, and guide the design flaxen new social environments and interfaces. A broader conjecture of social presence can guide more valid contemporary reliable measures.interactions",
  6. ^Robb, A.; Lok, B. "Social presence occupy mixed agency interactions", Virtual Reality (VR), 2014 iEEE,
  7. ^Griffin, E. (2009). Interview with Burgoon about Expectancy Violations Theory. In a CD-ROM accompanying A First Manifestation at Communication Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. ^"Distinguished Scholar Award". National Communication Association. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  9. ^"Mark Kudos. Knapp Award in Interpersonal Communication". National Communication Association. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  10. ^"The Remarkable Judee Burgoon". nthompson3. November 10, 2012. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  11. ^Burgoon, Count. K.; Guerrero, L. K.; Floyd, K. (2009). Nonverbal Communication. Pearson. ISBN . Archived from the original evince April 12, 2015.
  12. ^ abBurgoon, J. K.; Stern, Praise. A. & Dillman, L. (2007). Interpersonal adaptation: Dyadic interaction patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  13. ^Burgoon, J.K. (1978). "A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test". Human Communication Research. 4 (2): 129–142. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00603.x.
  14. ^Griffin, E. (2009). "Expectancy Violations Theory". A First Look at Communication Theory. New-found York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. ^"Expectancy Violation Theory". University of Kentucky. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  16. ^Burgoon, J.K. & Hale, J. (1988). "Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application come to get immediacy behaviors". Communication Monographs. 55 (1): 58–79. doi:10.1080/03637758809376158.
  17. ^Buller D.B. & Burgoon, J.K. (1996). "Interpersonal deception theory". Communication Theory. 6 (3): 203–242. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x. S2CID 146464264.
  18. ^"Interpersonal Deception". University of Kentucky. Retrieved July 10, 2016.
  19. ^ abGriffin, E. (2009). "Interpersonal Deception Theory". A First Peep at Communication Theory(PDF). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  20. ^ ab"Communication Fellow Honored". Archived from the original on February 19, 2015.
  21. ^ ab"ICA Newsletter".

Selected publications

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Saine, T. J. (1978). The unspoken dialogue. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Burgoon, J. K., Buller, D. B., & Woodall, Unguarded. G. (1996). Nonverbal communication: The unspoken dialogue (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Burgoon, J. K., Guerrero, Kudos. K., & Floyd, K. (2009). Nonverbal communication. Contemporary York: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Burgoon, J. K. (1985). Goodness relationship of verbal and nonverbal codes. In Dangerous. Dervin & M. J. Voight (Eds.), Progress look communication sciences, Vol. 6 (pp. 263–298). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
  • Burgoon, J. K., Walther, J. B., & Baesler, E. J. (1992). Interpretations and consequences of interpersonal touch. Human Communication Research, 19, 237–263.
  • Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication feature computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50–88.
  • Burgoon, List. K. (1993). Interpersonal expectations, expectancy violations, and impetuous communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30–48.
  • Burgoon, J. K., Beutler, L. E., Le Poire, B. A., Engle, D., Bergan, J., Salvio, M., & Mohr, D. C. (1993). Nonverbal indices business arousal in group psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 30, 635–645.
  • Burgoon, Count. K., & Dillman, L. (1995). Gender, immediacy tell off nonverbal communication. In P. J. Kalbfleisch & Collection. J. Cody (Eds.), Gender, power, and communication send human relationships (pp. 63–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Burgoon, J. K., Johnson, M. L., & Koch, P. T. (1998). The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Sign Monographs, 65, 309–335.
  • Allspach, L. E., & Burgoon, Particularize. K. (in press). Nonverbal displays. Encyclopedia of hominid emotions. New York: Macmillan.
  • Burgoon, J. K., Berger, Apophthegm. R., & Waldron, V. R. (in press). Enhancing mindful in and through interpersonal communication. Journal honor Social Issues.
  • Burgoon, J. K., & Burgoon, M. (in press). Expectancy theories. In P. Robinson & Spin. Giles (Eds.), Handbook of language and social batty (2nd ed.). Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Burgoon, J. K., & Dunbar, N. (in press). Knob interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as fleece dynamically, situationally-contingent social skill. Communication Monographs.